Terrestrial Passions: A Regency Romance, with Aliens by S.P. SomtowMy rating: 3 of 5 stars
I had never previously heard of this author, although he's a well-known polymath who has written a number of books, some of which are speculative fiction. I picked the book up because I enjoy both spec-fic and Regency romance, and this offered a combination of the two.
Unfortunately, while it has some elements of a Regency romance, it manages to be almost completely unlike one, like the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation vending machine in Hitchhiker's Guide that always produced a beverage almost, but not entirely, unlike tea. The overall tone is much closer to an 18th-century bawdy comedy (like The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling ) than to Jane Austen, and while I wouldn't say that it has more anachronisms, Americanisms or malapropisms than the average 21st-century-written Regency romance, it does have different ones. Note that I read a pre-publication ARC (which had some significant formatting issues, and was therefore hard to read, because of the file format I received it in), and some of the errors I outline below may be fixed before publication.
The author was born in Thailand, educated at Eton and Cambridge, and spent some time living in the US; sometimes the words he uses are used in the US rather than the British sense ("betimes" and "celebrants," for example), and sometimes they are just wrong, like "mealy-mouthed" to describe a character who is extremely frank and uncensored, the opposite of what "mealy-mouthed" means. He's fond of the word "melisma," and sometimes uses it, incorrectly, for instrumental as well as vocal performances. The word "lugging" is used to indicate "throwing".
There are a couple of instances where some cultural detail is a little off, too, such as styling noblemen "the Right Honourable" when they are not ministers of state, or referring to "the ton" in a way that does not reference a single united body. I didn't believe that someone would be "the Earl of Little Chiswick"; it would be "Earl of Chiswick," with Little Chiswick being one of the associated places. Nor did I really believe "Lord Chuzzlewit"; it's too Dickensian a name.
There are a couple of minor continuity errors; an unimportant character who starts out as Lady Sanditon becomes Mrs. Sanditon, and a conversation which starts at the end of one chapter as people arrive home for a party continues at the beginning of the next chapter, but takes place before they leave the party.
The characters, who live a couple of miles from London, are so non-cosmopolitan that most of them are entirely prepared to believe that a blue alien is a Frenchman, and they react with surprising aplomb when he performs apparent magic using his advanced technology, or speaks about his alien culture in ways that a Regency English person, in an era of French cultural dominance, should know are not true of France. In fact, that was one of my biggest issues with the book: the way people acted didn't ring true, either to human nature in general or the time and place in particular. One of the key things about Regency romance is how much people care about certain things (the opinion of the ton, getting an advantageous marriage, proper behaviour - all of which are, of course, deeply entangled); the things these people care about, or rather the things they don't care about, don't feel authentic to the period.
Of course, a lot of Regency romances written today impose the sensibilities and cultural values of, often, the contemporary US on the England of 200 years ago. This book mostly doesn't do that, but still manages to be jarring with it. Arabella, one of the several main characters, is a (largely self-taught) intellectual, and holds advanced views on the position of women and on slavery which are not anachronistic for her time, though they line up with our modern sensibilities. But when she discovers that her love interest, a slave owner in America, had children with multiple slaves, who he didn't consider human enough to even consider them bastards, by means of sex that was coercive, even if it wasn't violent, because of the power differential (a point she herself has made earlier in a slightly different context) - she doesn't appear to care. It's not a dealbreaker, or even much of a concern. Her mother, another of the main characters, discovers that (view spoiler), and is completely unperturbed. Arabella's sister Anna (view spoiler) Anna is also foul-mouthed in a way that would bring instant shock and condemnation from any actual member of the Regency middle class; nobody is at all bothered by this. That's what I mean when I say that it feels a lot more like an 18th-century story than an early-19th-century one, though with extra anti-Christian sentiment that feels more like the author's intrusion.
There's a Cinderella vibe running throughout, with the alien in the role of fairy godmother, providing the wherewithal for the sisters to go to the ball and thereby attract their mates. There's even a clever classical reference to a book with a Latin title that means "turning into a pumpkin" - there's the Eton and Cambridge coming out - and the magic/advanced technology indistinguishable from magic ends at midnight (view spoiler). To me, though, the happily-ever-after ending felt both unearned and unconvincing.
The spec-fic aspects came across to me as contrived, the aliens being so advanced that they might as well be powerful Fae or demigods; it was a thin shell of technological language over whatever the plot required in order to be more strange and wonderful, or just to have a sense of movement (the alien requires certain resources in order to remain alive and contact his people, but this doesn't quite manage to provide urgency to the plot). The alien is also aware of Earth technological and cultural references that are in the future from the point of view of the setting, though time travel is never mentioned.
Overall, I felt it was a bit of a mess, which missed any authentic feel of the genre or the time and place and also didn't work for me in terms of an emotional arc for any of the characters or a plot that made much structural sense. The multiple characters diffused the plot in too many directions, and they seemed not to care about the things they ought to have cared about. It's a miss as far as I'm concerned.
View all my reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment