Friday, 20 March 2026

Review: Murder on the Airship

Murder on the Airship Murder on the Airship by Victoria Bergman
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I've been reading a lot of classic mystery books lately, largely because a lot of the new fantasy books coming out now are not to my taste. So I was pleased to find that this book combined the two: a mystery with a limited pool of suspects (but there are seven of them, so it takes some work), set in a fantasy world. I also enjoyed the fact that the detective wasn't a brilliant savant but an ordinary guard, thrust into the position of having to solve the crime because her boss has been (non-fatally) poisoned in the course of events, who takes a doggedly persistent approach to interviewing the suspects and figuring out the course of events. It's much more Freeman Wills Crofts than Austin W. Freeman, in other words, and if you're also a fan of hundred-year-old mystery books you'll probably know what that means. Also, there's no romance, indeed no romantic or sexual relationships, whatsoever, and while I don't object to those, it is refreshing to have a book that just focuses on the mystery.

The course of events is complicated, meaning that it's far from clear for a long time who has committed what crime, and specifically who has committed the murder. It's well orchestrated and cleverly done, though, like the protagonist, I wondered how all these people hadn't stumbled across each other while nefariously wandering the ship late at night.

It's usually a pretty sound rule of thumb that if there's an airship in a book, there are also multiple vocabulary errors. I don't know why this is. Fortunately, in this book I only spotted one such error, a common one which I will mention to the publisher and which may well be gone by publication. (I had a pre-publication version via Netgalley for review.)

The editing is generally OK, though there are a few common issues - occasional missing past perfect tense, "may" in past tense narration where it should be "might" - and a slight oddity in the punctuation of some dialog. Again, I'll mention these to the publisher, and some of them may well be fixed by publication.

This is a sound piece of mystery writing, and an appealing fantasy world, two things I enjoy separately which it turns out I also enjoy together. I'll be looking out for more from this author.

View all my reviews

Wednesday, 18 March 2026

Review: Joan & Co.

Joan & Co. Joan & Co. by Frederick Orin Bartlett
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Pig-in-a-poke book, picked up from the Project Gutenberg feed without knowing anything about it, or the author, not even the genre. It turned out to be a good find.

It's a romance, of sorts, but it's more than that; there's a theme, too. It's a very character-driven book, so let's start with the characters.

Mr Burnett has built up his business (manufacturing patent leather) over 30 years, and is doing well. He would love to hand it over to his son Dickie, recently graduated from college, but Dickie isn't very interested in the business. In fact, the only thing Dickie is interested in is Joan, the beautiful daughter of a wealthy family (wealthier than the Burnetts, though not so much so that they're in different social strata). Joan has also recently graduated, but unlike Dickie, she is discontented with the shallow and narrow life of her social circle and wants to do something that matters.

Her eyes have been opened to this shallowness and narrowness by befriending Mildred, a woman who had scrimped and saved and come out from Montana to attend college (the same one as Joan) and better herself - only to starve and work herself to death. Through Mildred, Joan briefly met Devons, Mildred's cousin, who comes from a similar hardscrabble background (his father's a small farmer), and has managed to get educated and come up with a revolutionary new process to produce patent leather. But nobody will stake him to compete with the Burnetts, and the vice-president of Burnett's, a scheming fellow named Forsythe, offers him a pittance to buy it outright, and no other deal.

Devons has run out of money to live on, and goes out in bad weather, undernourished, to ask an old friend for a job, but is fortunate enough to be run down by Joan's car before he dies of exposure. Recognising him as Mildred's cousin, she takes him home and ensures he's nursed back to health, getting to know him in the process. She wants to invest in his process so he can start his business, but has no money she controls of her own. However, Dickie, whose proposal she recently turned down, said that regardless, she could always ask anything of him, and what she asks is for him to fund the business.

With his usual lack of interest in anything other than Joan, Dickie makes no inquiries as to what the business is, and Joan is unaware of where Dickie's family get their money (it's apparently not something you talk about in their circles). She also doesn't mention Dickie's surname to Devons. So Dickie is funding not only his rival in love (because Devons has fallen for Joan too), but, unbeknown to any of them, his father's rival in business.

There's a certain amount of coincidence involved in setting this up, of course, but I didn't mind it, because it was in the interests of causing conflict, not resolving it, or removing character agency.

Complications, of course, ensue, not least because of the scheming of Forsythe, which ends up blowing up in his face. Along the way, the author contrasts two kinds of people: those who have too little money and must struggle to get ahead, sacrificing their health and wellbeing to do so, and those who have too much obtained too easily, who live a pointless existence with nothing to strive for. The two generations of the Burnetts represent the two situations, but so do Devons and Joan, in a different way. Joan, at least, is trying to involve herself, to do something that matters to someone, even if - raised to be unworldly and naive - she doesn't know how to go about it.

Both of the young men try to put Joan on a pedestal as a princess and do everything for her, but she doesn't want that; she wants to serve, to do something that matters, even if only to one person. The gendered work assumptions of the time do come in here, but not so blatantly that they became a big problem for me. Joan has been deliberately raised to be ornamental rather than useful, and her rebellion against this is consequently somewhat ineffectual, but at least she does rebel.

There is a happy ending in which everyone gets at least a form of what they wanted (except for Forsythe, who's the designated villain), but the form of what they wanted is generally not what they thought they wanted, and not what I was expecting. This is a good thing.

Because it's not formulaic, and because it does have, and competently develop, a thought-provoking and well-thought-through theme, and because it's well edited and in general soundly written without being overwritten, it gets five stars from me. It's a buried gem from more than 100 years ago, and I'm glad I uncovered it and took a chance on it.

View all my reviews

Monday, 16 March 2026

Review: Library of the Unbound

Library of the Unbound Library of the Unbound by Tuuli Tolmov
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I somehow missed the "YA" part in the blurb, so I got more teen angst and love triangle than I was looking for (I wasn't looking for any). My fault, not the author's.

Leaving that aside, this is an enjoyable adventure with an appealing main character. She has poor judgement, but at least she knows that, and tries not to make it worse by drinking alcohol. Though tempted to nope out from the whole mess she's got involved in, she reluctantly - but bravely and effectively - does the right thing.

She's a booktamer, who takes magical books that have gained sentience and turns them back into ordinary books again - meaning that people can use the magical rituals in them, which turns out to be a problem.

The worldbuilding is mixed. It's an alternate history, in which there was a religious revolution 600 years ago that suppressed magic and installed a theocratic government. For some reason, the names of places are mostly either their Roman names (Londinium, Lutetia, Hispania, Brittania) or medieval (the kingdom of the Franks, Saracenia). There's a continuing war - a crusade, basically - against Saracenia, in which the Church Knights, who are the elite, are fighting, but that doesn't come into the main story. There's also either a geographical difference or the author has made a mistake, because Lutetia (Paris) is apparently on the coast.

On the other side of the worldbuilding coin, technology is basically what anyone born in the past 30 years would be used to as the norm: cellphones, laptops, tablets (though those last are supposed to be reserved to the elite).

The main character has trust issues, which are fully justified throughout the book, but there are well-intentioned people too. The plot has a few twists in it, and plenty of suspense.

I gather the author is not a native English speaker. This mostly shows in sentences that start out in the past tense and finish in the present tense, or nouns and verbs occasionally not agreeing in number, or idioms that are very slightly off, though there are also a few instances of dialog punctuation not following the conventions. Honestly, I've seen much worse from authors who are native English speakers, but (despite crediting plural editors and beta readers) it does need another round of editing to be really tidy. Since I had a pre-publication version via Netgalley for review, it may get one after the version that I saw.

It's an appealing book, and I enjoyed it even though I'm not much of a YA tropes fan.

View all my reviews

Review: Tea & Treachery at the Infinite Pantry

Tea & Treachery at the Infinite Pantry Tea & Treachery at the Infinite Pantry by Jo Miles
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Extremely earnest in a very specifically mid-2020s way that will date it quickly, but if you read a lot of cozy fantasy, you're either looking for that or at least don't mind too much.

It's an original concept, though. Instead of a library or a hospitality business, we have something that combines elements of both: a kind of museum of magically preserved food (which also has three libraries and a hospitality business attached). But something has started going wrong with the preservation magic, not to mention that a major funder has just been lost, and Glen, the recently appointed head of the institution, has to pull everyone together (and hold herself together) while they all try to solve the problems.

There's never any indication where Glen fitted into the picture before she was promoted, which to me was a notable omission. She shows no particular in-depth familiarity with any of the areas of work in the institution, the heads of the departments that play major roles in the crisis all seem to have had their positions for a while, and nobody acts like they recently reported to her specifically. She has long backstory (raised by a grandmother who emotionally abused her and made use of her while undermining her self-confidence), but no recent backstory that I could see.

I spotted the source of the issue at the 10% mark. (view spoiler) I didn't spot the mechanism, though I probably should have; there were plenty of clues. But this book isn't primarily about solving the mystery, but about the journey of the people who are trying to solve it, and their relationships, including a romance that emerges in the course of the story.

There's a nasty rich noble guy who's the main villain. The rich and the noble are overlapping groups, and apparently hold enough power that there's no suggestion that he face any consequences for (view spoiler), though there are also no immediate consequences to the institution from defying and thwarting him. It was another pair of what struck me as odd omissions.

The editing, happily, is above average, with few and minor glitches, which helped it hold onto its fourth star, despite the fairly basic worldbuilding (usual in cozy fantasy) and the couple of holes I mentioned above. The other thing that got it four stars, though, was that I enjoyed visiting the place and following the people, most of whom are lovely. I will be watching out for a sequel.

View all my reviews

Thursday, 12 March 2026

Review: We Solve Murders

We Solve Murders We Solve Murders by Richard Osman
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I liked it but didn't love it.

I liked the hapless ex-cop Steve, dragged willy-nilly into a round-the-world pursuit of clues to several murders that look like someone is trying to pin them on his beloved daughter-in-law Amy. He just wants a small, quiet life back in his village with his mates in the pub and his cat. I get it, and I don't think he's wrong to want that. I liked his mate Tony, an ordinary bloke with a garage, as well, for much the same reasons.

I didn't like Amy nearly as much. She is disengaged from her emotions because of a traumatic childhood, and scored high on her boss's homemade "psychopath test". She's not actually a psychopath; she knows right from wrong and which one she's pursuing, but she doesn't indulge in feelings about it. This leaves her a bit superficial as a character, especially since she's mostly reactive rather than proactive.

I didn't like her boss much either, for similar reasons.

I disliked the bestselling novelist, Rosie, considerably. She's so rich she's not even sure whether or not she owns a helicopter. She's still (in approximately her 70s, probably, but she refuses to say) living the same lifestyle of sex and drugs and private jets that she started on in the 1980s, and feels fine about it.

The other viewpoint characters I don't think I was meant to like, apart from the hapless and clueless would-be influencer Bonnie (just a young mother trying to do what she loves in a way that will help her kids have a better life) and the head-in-the-sand talent agent who is being used by the villains. There's a self-regarding action movie actor who's awful in various ways. The villains are obsessed with money and casual about ruining or ending people's lives, more so than I was expecting from a cozy author, though I haven't read contemporary cozy previously. Most of my mystery and thriller reading has been of books from a century or more ago.

The whole thing reminded me of one of Dave Barry's novels; general comedic/bantering tone, casually nasty criminals, hapless ordinary protagonists (apart from the ones who are basically superheroes). It didn't mesh well with my taste overall, but I appreciated that it was well executed and well edited.

I do still intend to try the Thursday Murder Club, which may be closer to my idea of cozy, but my hopes are lower for it now, and I won't be continuing with this series. Again, this is about my taste, not the quality of the work.

View all my reviews

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

Review: 1066 and all that: A memorable history of England

1066 and all that: A memorable history of England 1066 and all that: A memorable history of England by W.C. Sellar
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I first read this, I think from my school library, many years ago. On re-read, I realize that I don't know as much English history as I thought I did, and in particular I have a big gap in the 18th century, though I'm shaky on parts of the Middle Ages too.

What I do know helped me appreciate the cleverness of this book, which is supposed to represent what the average English person actually remembers from their school history lessons (as at circa 1930, at least). It satirizes the overly patriotic, not to say jingoistic, England-centric way that history was taught at the time; whether or not England is Top Nation is a point that keeps getting reverted to. I had to smile at the description of the Pope and all his followers seceding from the Church of England in the reign of Henry VIII.

The more you know about the subject matter, the funnier it will be.

View all my reviews

Monday, 9 March 2026

Review: The Man Who Bought London

The Man Who Bought London The Man Who Bought London by Edgar Wallace
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

"A man who marries for money is like a dog that climbs a steeple for a bone. He gets his meal, but there isn't any comfortable place to sleep it off."

This book features not one, but two romances between someone who's rich and someone who isn't, one of the parties being the title character. King Kerry is buying up property in London on behalf of an American "trust," and as part of that purchases a department store where our heroine works (but is about to not work; she's been late a number of times, and is inclined to snark her boss, rather wonderfully). She reminds Kerry of another girl who had a tragic end, so he takes her on as his secretary.

Twelve years later, Wallace revisited the department store as a setting and the "new woman" as a main character in Barbara On Her Own . Barbara is more central, and more capable, than this book's Elsie, driving the plot where Elsie tends to just ride along.

There's a complicated twist at the heart of the story that only comes out at the end. It's potentially controversial for modern audiences, but it's a big spoiler, so I'll put it in spoiler tags: (view spoiler)

It's fast-moving like all of Wallace's books, twisty, sometimes comedic and sometimes suspenseful. The ending, I felt, was abrupt and didn't give the wrap-up the time it deserved, but I enjoyed the journey there.

View all my reviews