Wednesday, 18 February 2026

Review: Twig's Traveling Tomes

Twig's Traveling Tomes Twig's Traveling Tomes by Gryffin Murphy
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This one reads as if it was consciously crafted to appeal to the Platonic ideal of the cozy fiction fan, and indeed it is being published because it drew the attention of the "tastemaker" who discovered Travis Baldree. My cozy fantasy bingo card filled up quickly: tea, love of books, small business, gender and relationship diversity in all the usual ways (except that nobody is clearly trans), broadly D&D-style setting, quirky introvert protagonist being pushed out of her comfort zone by events, supportive love interest, cute familiar (though not until halfway through).

For me, contrarian that I am, this was almost a downside. It's not all the way to "made from box mix," but it does fall into my category of "if you like this sort of thing, this is definitely one." I personally prefer fresher ideas rather than variations on an established theme, but I know I'm in a minority there, and lots of people will love this unreservedly.

The worldbuilding, while not startlingly original, has had a bit more work than is often the case with cozy. Four kingdoms themed around the traditional four elements, elemental and natural magic, approximately the usual D&D species, though elves have brightly coloured skin and gnomes brightly coloured hair.

The editing is also a bit above average; there are several of the usual issues (occasional missing past perfect tense, "may" in past tense narration instead of "might," dialog sometimes punctuated incorrectly), but fewer examples than I usually see. The biggest problem is the vocabulary. The author uses a number of words that don't have quite the right connotation (the most obvious example being "amorously" for "lovingly" when it isn't sexual love), and a couple that sound similar to the word she means but are a different word, like "hurdling" for "hurtling" and "clamored" for "clambered". Both of those are relatively common confusions, and there may yet be more editing before publication; I had a pre-publication version via Netgalley for review.

The romance begins with instant attraction, then there's a long will-they-won't-they period (about three-quarters of the book) with minimal justification given. There's some very steamy kissing and some innuendo, but nothing more than that on screen.

There's nothing so badly wrong with it that I feel justified in dropping it to three stars, but I'm giving it four a bit grudgingly. Put that down to my curmudgeonly nature and dislike of the expected choice.

View all my reviews

Monday, 16 February 2026

Review: Look to the Lady

Look to the Lady Look to the Lady by Margery Allingham
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Kicks off with a great burst of fascinating, suspenseful, apparently inexplicable events, explains them, and continues that cycle until the end.

There's a wonderful contrast between Campion's persona of an upper-class twit who doesn't even quote classic literature (like Wodehouse's characters), but the cliches of the advertising industry, and his actual keen intelligence and wonderful ability to organize surprising events. This is assisted by his wide circle of lowlife contacts, so not only does he have a mask over his real personality, but he lives two distinct lives in different spheres (using a number of different pseudonyms, of which "Albert Campion" is one; his real first name, apparently, is Rudolph, and his surname a famous one from an old aristocratic house).

Like the previous book in the series, this one takes place around a very ancient country manor in a remote rural district of England. This one, though, protects an ancient chalice on behalf of the Crown, using a combination of subterfuge and what appears to be a supernatural guardian.

The action blasts along, with real danger at plenty of suspenseful moments, the characters are varied and amusing, and the title is a big hint at the villain. It's like an Edgar Wallace, but more clever, and I'm a big fan of Wallace even with his pulpy limitations. I'm looking forward to more in this fortunately long series.

View all my reviews

Thursday, 12 February 2026

Review: There's Not a Bathing Suit in Russia: & Other Bare Facts

There's Not a Bathing Suit in Russia: & Other Bare Facts There's Not a Bathing Suit in Russia: & Other Bare Facts by Will Rogers
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Rogers was a comedian, known as the "Cowboy Philosopher," and this is a mixture of comic observation delivered in a down-home manner with actually insightful reflections on Russia. His introduction says that everyone has been writing about Russia lately, and the difference with this book is that he doesn't claim to know anything about the topic, but he's being too modest; he actually went there (unlike some of the contemporary pundits he pokes fun at), and has some thoughts that still resonate today.

The Russian revolution was still relatively recent at the time, and he first discusses the Russian refugees he encountered in Paris. All of them claimed to be dukes or higher, and his reflection is that they obviously hadn't had those positions based on any merit, since they're doing menial jobs and not even doing them very well. No wonder Russia was in a mess if they were in charge.

On the other hand, he skewers socialists for being much better at giving speeches and publishing newspapers than they are at running anything. Nobody could run a country the size of Russia very well, and they aren't doing so. This isn't entirely their fault, but if someone isn't good at something, they should admit it and leave off, is his opinion. Not to mention: "We all know a lot of things that would be good for our Country, but we wouldent want to go so far as propose that everybody start shooting each other till we got them. A fellow shouldent have to kill anybody just to prove they are right." Something that more and more people in today's America should probably be reminded of.

The first section, where he's clowning around and being satirical and describing his journey before he gets to Russia, is less interesting than his observations after he gets there, but it is fun in its own way. The whole thing is short, and well worth reading.

View all my reviews

Review: The Good Comrade

The Good Comrade The Good Comrade by Una Lucy Silberrad
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Not, as you might assume from the title, a socialist novel.

The "Good Comrade" is the name given to the McGuffin, a rare blue daffodil, but it's named by the heroine in honour of the three men who love her, and one of them also independently thought of her by the same title. The book is a reflection on the nature of relationships, mostly between men and women, but also in families, and between unrelated people with no romantic connection. Being English, it also has a strong theme related to social class, that most English way of people relating to other people.

I picked it up from Project Gutenberg a while ago on the recommendation of a fellow member of the Codex writers' forum. That forum is for speculative fiction writers, but it isn't spec-fic, or my other main reading genre, mystery/thriller; if anything, it's a romance, but a very unusual one. The big strength of the book, as of its heroine, is that it's unexpected and not like others. (Authentically not like, rather than "not like other girls".)

The heroine, Julia, comes from a family that has fallen into relative poverty from its already very minor social status because of the father's gambling problem. He was encouraged to leave the army with the rank of captain, which he still uses. In English literature, a retired army officer only having made captain often indicates that he was either unpromotable or terminated his career early for probably dodgy reasons, and in this case it's both. (Christie's Captain Hastings is an exception.)

The family, however, do everything they can to put up a good front and conceal their fall. Their drawing room, for example, is better furnished than the rest of the house, since that's the part visitors see. Julia, the middle daughter, sees this for the trumpery it is, and is the only one who has much gumption or tries to do anything other than marry for (relatively minor) advantage. She's not as good-looking as her two sisters, but I found it fully plausible that several men fell in love with her anyway, because she's such an interesting person - intelligent and not overly bound by convention (including, it's remarked by one of her admirers, the conventions of the usual unconventional person, the bohemian - she doesn't have that pose either).

This is probably why she goes on a day's walk in his company. They've become friends, non-romantic, and enjoy each other's company - they are "good comrades," in fact. This occurs in the Dutch village where Julia is working as a paid companion in the house of a bulb grower, a prosperous merchant who loves his trade for its own sake, as does his son, rather than purely for the money they can make from it. The pair, Julia and her male friend, get lost on their walk when a fog comes down, and spend the night outside together, perfectly innocently - but her Calvinistic Dutch employers are obliged to treat her as having compromised herself utterly and dismiss her without a reference. (This is 1907.)

The plot doesn't follow convention much more than Julia does, though it's not experimental; it just doesn't go in the expected directions, and is mostly unpredictable, though I did spot what Julia's next move was likely to be after her dismissal. (view spoiler)

There are some great character observations, of Julia's father, of his friend, of Julia's several suitors, and of course of Julia herself. Her character develops and is revealed through the choices she makes, and she's an admirable person without being perfect at all. Also, various characters take action and are inspired by each other, or their ideas about each other. The characters and their relationships are the great strength of the book.

Its weakness is that the author's style is patchy. She can convey a sense of place wonderfully, but she doesn't write beautiful prose for the most part, and is difficult to quote because her well-observed points tend to be a paragraph or two long rather than a sentence. She's also rather given to comma-splicing. That kept the book off the Platinum tier of my annual list, but it's certainly worthy of five stars as far as I'm concerned.

According to Wikipedia, Silberrad was thought of as a "middlebrow" writer, who steered a course firmly between the conservatism that stood for the way things currently were and the radicalism that wanted to burn it all down, aiming along what would actually be the trajectory of the 20th century: gradual improvement in various social measures, particularly the equality and freedom of women. That's probably why I like her book. I myself concluded long ago that, as well as being middle-aged and middle-class, I'm also middlebrow; no point in denying it, might as well embrace it. And my own politics are neither radical nor reactionary. Julia is just the kind of intelligent (though not necessarily highly educated), capable and determined character I enjoy reading about, and I recommend the book unreservedly.

View all my reviews

Monday, 9 February 2026

Review: Tusks, Tails and Teacakes

Tusks, Tails and Teacakes Tusks, Tails and Teacakes by T.L. Stone
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

If the cover and the format of the title didn't clue you in, this is cozy fantasy of the Legends and Lattes variety. Sword-and-sorcery/D&D world (with tieflings carefully renamed as "hellkin" and tabaxi as "panthera" for legal distinctness), in which an adventurer leaves the life and settles down in a nice little town running a hospitality business. It isn't just one of the several clones, though; it has its own original plot and characters in the same subgenre, so if you're a Travis Baldree fan you can read it and enjoy it without feeling like it's just an inferior ripoff.

The reason for the protagonist, a half-elf rogue named Lira, to come to a small-town tavern and start working there is a strong one, not less so for the fact that it's a version of the inciting incident for half the cozy mystery/romance books set in small towns: she's originally from there, and left after her grandmother died, in order to go on the road with an adventuring party. Now, in the wake of the loss of a companion (told in the prologue), her party has broken up, and she's come back to get something she stashed when she left with them originally some years previously: her grandmother's recipe book, all she has of the woman who raised her apart from the memories. Unfortunately, she buried it in the tavern cellar, and someone has since built a stone wall on top of the spot (it never becomes clear who, or exactly why, or when), complicating the retrieval.

Presumably at some point she came back, because there's also some gold buried with the book, and she didn't have any when she left with the party; it was apparently from a subsequent quest. This is a bit of continuity that didn't fully make sense to me.

As she works, along with a dwarf woman who she caught attempting to rob the tavern, to tidy the place up and bring in more clientele as a cover for plotting to get her book back, she discovers that she likes it here and likes doing this and is making friends. But then the past comes back to bite her, and there's a confrontation, in which one of my not-favourite tropes occurs. (view spoiler)

Before I proceed to more critique, I want to say that I did enjoy this considerably. The worldbuilding, while off-the-shelf, felt a lot less like scenery flats than in some other books in the genre, the plot mostly made sense and progressed organically, the characters felt like they belonged in their world rather than ours (although with some up-to-date attitudes that are de rigueur in the genre), and the wee beastie - a stoat, not a racoon as per the blurb - was endearing. It managed to sit firmly in its subgenre without just being made from box mix, and shows decent writing ability.

The stove pinged my worldbuilding geekery briefly, though. Both the oven and a "burner" on the stove get "turned off," implying that this isn't a coal or woodburning range but (probably) gas. Where is the gas coming from? It's not magic, because in this setting magic has become relatively uncommon, after the teaching of magic was forbidden some decades previously. It just seemed not to fit well with the general tech level.

The editing is just a little scruffy, too. Most of the issues are with commas where they shouldn't be, and most of those are between adjectives that are not coordinate, but lots of people make that mistake. Most of the other commas where they shouldn't be are after "of course" when it's just confirming a previous statement; word processor grammar checkers are not sophisticated enough to distinguish that from the case where you do need a comma, because you're providing completely new information. Apart from these usage issues, though, there are a number of words that are either mistyped or not typed at all, and therefore missing from the sentences that require them. I've seen plenty of books far worse than this, and I didn't spot any vocabulary being used incorrectly, but it has room for improvement.

The other thing that I wasn't completely sold on was the rapid progression of a couple of romances, one of which hit marriage and the other moving in together after about a month of dating in both cases. And in the case of the second one, it was between people who hadn't known each other long or very well before they started dating (I may as well call it that, because even though that's not a concept that was around in the time periods of our world that sword & sorcery approximately evokes, relationships in this book's world follow modern practice). There was no plot reason for it to be only a month, either; it could have been longer. I won't give it my "weak-romance" tag, because that's for people who decide to get married after barely spending any time together, and this isn't that, but it does seem precipitate.

So there are ways in which it could be better (from my point of view; some or all of these things may not bother you whatsoever), but I liked it, and want to continue with the series.

View all my reviews

Sunday, 8 February 2026

Review: Majera

Majera Majera by Gideon Marcus
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Six years after the publication of the first book, what looks like being the final book in this four-book series is here (for certain values of "here"; I received a pre-publication review copy from the author, because I'd reviewed the previous books in the series).

Time for a retrospective.

Book 1: Pacy, dramatic, scientifically reasonably plausible. An accidental circumstance means a group of young people have to work together to overcome a serious issue and get back home, and they work together well. There's some light flirting that doesn't come to anything.

Book 2: People who aren't action heroes have to cope with rescues, escapes and drama caused by engineers not thinking about safety (that part I found implausible). There's a coincidence in which they arrive at the exact right moment to be of help, but I forgave it because of good pacing and overall good execution. We learn that all of the human crew are bisexual, though romance and sex are emotional complications during the action rather than a focus.

Book 3: Still lots of action, lucky and unlucky chance, and the protagonist seems to distort narrative probability around her so that a rag-tag young crew can achieve what they shouldn't be able to. There's a political dimension, but they choose sides based on emotional connection rather than principle, which I thought was a missed opportunity for more depth. Some pairing up occurs, and more is attempted but fails because it's not the right time.

Book 4: Some action still, and again they arrive just in time to help after a disaster (this one probably centuries in the making), but can't really do much other than call in help from their government this time. In the course of their investigation of the circumstances, they're in some danger a couple of times but manage to avert it relatively easily; the circumstances are more significant in activating the characters' past trauma than in actually threatening their lives or physical wellbeing. We get some theories about what happened, but no definitive answer. There's a much stronger focus on relationships, which are now poly as well as bi, with clearly implied (but not described) sex, and the biggest question is (view spoiler).

For me - and others will no doubt differ - there was a steady, though not sharp, decline in how much I liked the books through the series. More coincidence, less focus on action and more on relationships, and in this last book less of a compelling threat than previously and less working together in desperate circumstances to resolve it. It doesn't drop out of the four-star level; it's still solid YA space opera, well executed. But for me, the first book was the best, and the others were, while still good, not quite at the same level.

View all my reviews

Thursday, 5 February 2026

Review: Wildflower: A Novel

Wildflower: A Novel Wildflower: A Novel by Becky Jenkinson
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

The worldbuilding is not a strength in this one, which isn't unusual in its particular type of current fantasy, but I felt the story was solid.

The character names are a classic "Aerith and Bob" situation, some of them botanical or otherwise nature-related, some of them from various origins in our world (including several from the Bible, in a setting where religion is conspicuous by its almost total absence and where the two brief passing references are to Standard Fantasy Paganism), and some completely made-up fantasy names, with no obvious schema to account for the mixture. The characters themselves mostly feel like mid-2020s people cosplaying (or, in at least one scene, just wearing modern clothing) in a generic ren-faire setting, and the setting itself feels too small, with places that seem like they ought to be a long way off instead being in easy walking distance. The review copy I had didn't have the map yet, but based on the travel times mentioned, the whole kingdom is about the size of the six boroughs of New York City (roughly 35 miles across). And yet a character who has long wished to visit a wonderful library just to the north has never found time to make the two-hour journey by horse (meaning about 10 or at the most 15 miles), and an afternoon's walk from the citadel, which occasionally gets snow flurries, takes you not only to but also up a mountain with a permanent snowcap and blizzard weather. The small size of the kingdom presumably accounts for the fact that, although there's a royal family (consisting of a king, a queen, and two princes), there doesn't appear to be an aristocracy, and both the queen and the older prince's fiancé are commoners.

The flower lore is interesting, though it has an obvious real-world model in the Victorian "language of flowers". It's the most original part of the worldbuilding.

The magic system is largely undefined, and what it can and can't do appears to be driven entirely by what the plot requires.

On the upside, even the pre-publication copy I received via Netgalley for review was well edited, apart from the occasional dangling modifier, fumbled idiom or clumsy phrasing, and a few cases where two words that are not synonyms are used as if they are. The emotional beats are sound. The plot is a proper plot, not just a slice of life, and it's driven by the decisions of the characters, some of which are bad ones such as real people make, and they make them for believable reasons. It's cozy in its presentation (after all, it's about a magical florist), but it has stakes and tension and losses and tragic backstory and desperate struggles and a strong climax.

The main character, Felicity, was born with a curse which prevents her from saying anything that isn't the truth. The rules seem to change a bit during the book; at one point she can say something that is her opinion, even if it's not commonly shared, but later on it's as if the very fact that she can say something means it's definitely true. Can't she be mistaken? Of course, this is also the point at which people stop believing her, because she's saying things they don't want to believe.

The queen has been using her as a snitch, which has made her unpopular, but when we see her being interviewed by the queen she's perfectly capable of concealing a lot of information, so that's a tell-versus-show mismatch, what I sometimes call a decal.

Perhaps the biggest strength of the book is that it depicts Felicity's inner life so well. Because she's unpopular for her truth-telling, she tries to be reliable and compliant and trustworthy and non-confrontational and a people-pleaser, and stuffs her feelings down and lets people walk all over her (like her only friend, a rather self-involved extravert who strongly reads "bard," though I don't think he has an occupation other than "prince's fiancé"). All of this starts coming apart quite early in the book, so we're, again, more told about her people-pleasing than we are shown, but it is emotionally accurate to someone who is this way. There are some highly emotional scenes, for Felicity and her love interest both, but they're justified by events and not just the characters being over-dramatic.

Emotionally sound writing balanced by basic and unconvincing worldbuilding and some elements that didn't ring quite true brings this in at three stars. A lot of people who don't demand much from worldbuilding will love it unreservedly, I'm sure.

View all my reviews