Review: Croft and Tabby: The Complete Collection

Croft and Tabby: The Complete Collection by Brad Magnarella
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A decent urban fantasy, kind of Dresden Files lite. Like Harry Dresden, Everson Croft is a youngish straight white wizard living in an apartment in a major US city with his large cat, and having to be careful around technology (I'm not sure how he's able to teach at a university without using a computer). However, the cat is possessed by a succubus and talks, so that's different.

Along with his friend Kayla, who's a somewhat flaky intuitive and puts him onto most of the cases, he sets out to do good and suppress dangerous supernatural entities. He fairly often gets hold of the wrong end of quite a dangerous stick, leading to danger and tribulation, but always wins through in the end, by a combination of a narrow set of magical abilities, courage, goodwill and the help of allies, sometimes including the snarky Tabitha (the possessed talking cat).

It's solid rather than amazing, but for the most part decently edited, except that it consistently uses "may" instead of "might" in past tense narration, occasionally misses a past perfect where one should ideally be, and confuses "leach" and "leech" (easy to do).

Not my new favourite or anything, but it's competently done and entertaining, and I'd read more in the series.

View all my reviews

Top Books for 2025

This is my twelfth annual roundup of recommended books that I read in the previous year. My summary page links to all the previous roundups.

In the early years, I arbitrarily matched the number of top books to the number of the year (so I had 14 books on the list in 2014). I abandoned that practice after the first four years, and in 2022 I loosened the criteria even further and included almost anything that I gave four or five stars to. Next year, I'm going to change what I do again, re-aligning the star ratings to be more consistent with what they are supposed to mean according to Goodreads and Amazon.

What I mean is that for the last few years I've been running a rating system of four tiers (bronze, silver, gold and platinum), of which the first three are given four stars, indicating that I enjoyed the book to a greater or lesser extent, and the platinum tier get five stars for being amazing. Next year, I'll re-jig this as follows:

• The top tier will still be five stars, but I'll collapse Gold and Platinum together. I may still single some books out for special praise (equivalent to the old Platinum), but I haven't decided yet.
• The former Silver tier, which was for solid books that weren't outright amazing but had few and forgiveable faults, will still be four stars.
• The former Bronze tier, which was for books with significant issues that I still at least partially enjoyed and felt were good enough to recommend, will now be three stars rather than four.
• Books with faults that I think are significant enough that I don't recommend them, though they did have some positive qualities, will now be two stars, where they used to get three.
• Books that I think are pretty much a disaster right across the board, which used to get two stars, will now get one star. I haven't used the one-star rating in years, so in practice my range started at two stars.

For this year, I will be keeping the "legacy" rating system, since I decided to change it partway through 2025 and didn't want to go back and adjust everything I'd done up to that point. This year's recommendation list once again has the largest number of books so far, at 133, out of the 159 books I read in their entirety in 2025 (counting standalone novellas and boxed sets both as one, which is what I've done in previous years, but not counting anything shorter than a novella). That's what two or three days a week of commuting by train will do: increase my reading by almost 60%, apparently. If my calculations are correct, the total number of recommendations across the 12 years is now 524. I had to adjust these numbers after my initial post, because I posted this roundup on the morning of the 31st, thinking I wouldn't complete more than my current book before the end of the year, and ended up reading another novella in the afternoon and evening.

There were another 24 books I started but decided not to finish, not counting a couple where I wasn't ever going to read them from cover to cover (like cookbooks). I'll mention below where I got them from. Also, I re-read two of my own books in preparation for writing a sequel, and I don't rate my own books - I think that's tacky. This is why the total number doesn't add up to 159.

Here are my figures in a table, for the last time before the reboot of the rating system (I'll start again fresh next year):

	5 star	4 star	3 star	2 star	Total
2025	5	128	22	1	156
2024	8	92	13	0	114
2023	6	82	12	2	102
2022	6	59	13	4	82
2021	5	54	29	3	90
2020	8	53	21	0	82
2019	11	36	17	1	65
2018	5	72	15	2	94
2017	10	56	19	0	85
2016	11	53	12	1	77
2015	11	68	19	2	101
2014	9	70	23	2	104
Total	95	823	215	18	1152
Average	8	68	18	2	96

So, out of more than 1000 books I've finished in the past 12 years, I've only rated about 8% at five stars. About 71% have been rated four stars, leaving just over 20% at three stars or below. This is because I do a lot of pre-filtering based on blurbs, other people's reviews and, sometimes, previews, and weed out the ones that are obviously going to be awful. Occasionally, I get fooled. I probably filter out some good stuff now and then as well, if the authors make their books sound generic or make an obvious mistake in their blurb, or don't hook me early enough in the preview, or if they get a lot of reviews that make it sound like I won't like their book even though I actually would if I tried it.

If I re-jigged this year's figures to reflect next year's scoring system, the numbers would be: 25 5-stars (6 platinum and 19 gold), 70 4-stars (silver), 39 3-stars (bronze), 22 2-stars (former 3-stars), and one 1-star (former 2-star). This is a more informative spread, I feel, and I should have made the shift to this approach earlier.

Tier Rankings

Here's the link to all of my "Best of 2025" books, and here are my Platinum tier (6 books), Gold tier (19 books), Silver tier (70 books) and Bronze tier (39 books).

A note: I've figured out how to link to lists of books on Goodreads that have the same tag (or "shelf") and were read in the same year. I will take the risk of using these links, knowing that if GR revises their code - which is honestly long overdue - the links may well stop working. I will give brief rundowns on the Gold and Platinum books below.

Discovery/Sources

As with the previous three years, I read a lot of classics, mostly from Project Gutenberg. This is partly because my previous best sources, Netgalley and BookBub, have been disappointing over the past few of years, featuring a lot of unimaginative cookie-cutter books, many of them in genres I don't care for. I read 85 books from Project Gutenberg: five I rated Gold, 41 Silver, and 23 Bronze, 14 at three stars and one (Tom Swift and his Submarine) at two stars. There were also eight that I stopped reading before I finished them, which I haven't counted in the total of 85. So a quarter of the Gold-tier books and almost two-thirds of the Silvers and Bronzes came from Gutenberg, which represented not quite half the total books I read.

Twenty-nine of this year's books came from NetGalley, reversing a trend of declining numbers in the last four years (16 in 2024, 20 in 2023, 25 in 2022 and 41 in each of the previous two years). Only one made Platinum (Francis Spufford's Nonesuch: A Novel), five Gold, nine Silver, nine Bronze, and five which earned only three stars. Because NetGalley books are pre-publication, I generally don't use my Needs Editing tag on them, since at least in theory they could get more editing before publication (though, honestly, they most likely won't), but three of them were so significantly bad that I did tag them, a three-star and two Bronzes, and one of the Bronze books got the Seriously Needs Editing tag. It was a superhero book, which for some reason are often particularly poorly edited. Six of the Netgalley books, though, got the Well Edited tag.

In addition, as in 2024, I again got 8 books from NetGalley that were either sufficiently bad or sufficiently not to my taste that I didn't finish them. I usually filter the books I pick up carefully, but on Netgalley (where I can't read a preview) I will take a risk on something that sounds like a fresh premise. Sometimes this works out; sometimes, as with these books, it does not.

I bought only nine books through BookBub this year that I finished, which is also up from previous years, one tagged as "Needs Editing" and two as "Seriously Needs Editing," none this year as "Well Edited"; four of them made Bronze, three Silver and one (Hannu Rajaniemi's The Quantum Thief) platinum, indicating that BookBub, like Netgalley, has slightly improved as a source of books for me, after several years of steady decline.

I picked up two more books via BookBub that I didn't finish, only one of which I actually bought; the other I dropped after reading the sample.

I read 18 ebooks from the library, fewer than last year, consisting of one Platinum, seven Gold, ten Silver, and no Bronze-tier books, plus a three-star. I also borrowed 4 physical books from the library, all by P.G. Wodehouse, of which three made Silver and one Bronze. In addition, I borrowed six e-audiobooks from the library, a Platinum, two Golds, a Silver, a Bronze and a three-star, plus two I didn't finish. That's a total of 30 library borrowings, with two Platinum, nine Gold, 14 Silver, two Bronze, two three-star and two not finished.

I maintain a large wishlist (80-odd titles) on Amazon entitled "Await Ebook Price Drop," and monitor it regularly. I bought only one book from my wishlist this year, a Silver, which I'd already had as an e-audiobook (in a full cast recording, and I wanted to re-read it in text because a full-cast recording drops some of the internal reflection of the characters).

I'm part of the Codex writers' forum, and occasionally pick up a book by a fellow Codexian, though I've not been on the forum much for a while. I picked up two books from Codexians this year. One I decided against after reading the sample (it was a pastiche of an author I'm a big fan of, and I didn't feel the book pulled the pastiche off), but the other made the Silver tier.

I bought no books based on an Amazon recommendations this year, at least not that I recorded. I may have missed one or two.

Best of the Best

I'll again just highlight the Platinum and Gold books this year, a total of 25 (up from 17 last year). Don't despise the Silver or even Bronze tiers, though; those are still recommendations, still books I enjoyed.

Gold Tier

Let's start with the books I liked a lot but that didn't quite make it to the highest possible level. In alphabetical order by author (links to my Goodreads reviews), this year with the source noted:

• Drake Hall and City of Serpents, both by Christina Baehr (library e-audiobooks). Books 2 and 4 in a strong series, of which the first made the list at Silver in 2024, and the third is on this year's list at Platinum. Dragons in Edwardian England, with the strongest grasp of period authenticity I've seen in a while.
• Out Law: A Dresden Files Novella, Jim Butcher (NetGalley). Harry Dresden teaches Being a Decent Human Being 101 to a scared criminal who wants to reform, but there's no lack of action and tension while he does so.
• The Seven Dials Mystery, Agatha Christie (Project Gutenberg). It's a pity Superintendent Battle never became as popular as some of Christie's other sleuths. I like him. Less like a Christie book and more like a Wodehouse book that collided with an Edgar Wallace book, to the benefit of both.
• Cicero James, Miracle Worker, Hal Emerson (NetGalley). Urban fantasy set in San Francisco, which manages to look realistically at the city's problems without falling into either of the main ideological camps, and while telling a suspenseful story of a man who's willing to sacrifice for the benefit of others.
• Slayers of Old, Jim C. Hines (NetGalley). I think Hines is underrated, and this "Buffy meets Golden Girls" tale of a retired supernatural slayer pulled back into the life as a consequence of youthful mistakes demonstrates why I think that. Particularly recommended if you're over 50.
• Lady of Magick, Sylvia Izzo Hunter (library ebook). That spelling would normally put me right off, but the first book made Silver last year, as did the third this year, and the series as a whole is solid and entertaining. An alternate Britain in which the Tudor line survived into the 19th century and magic is practiced.
• The Geomagician, Jennifer Mandula (NetGalley). Another alternate Britain with magic, but this time it's linked to fossils, and there's a pterodactyl which becomes a fossil-hunting woman's key to get into the boys' club. Based largely on real historical figures, and with strong reflection on important issues that doesn't bog down the story.
• The Mark of Zorro, Johnston McCulley (Project Gutenberg). Here's where the legend began (not only Zorro's, either, it inspired aspects of Superman and Batman), and it's as swashbuckling as you could wish, written with a delightful brio.
• The Summer War, Naomi Novik (NetGalley). A determined and capable young woman, my favourite type of protagonist, takes on a version of Faery that feels like the tales and ballads in order to save her brother.
• The Garden of Resurrection: Being the Love Story of an Ugly Man, E. Thurston Temple (Project Gutenberg). A moving, human and humane story of the attractiveness of being kind, from a now-obscure author.
• The Astonishing Adventure of Jane Smith and The Fire Within, Patricia Wentworth (Project Gutenberg). Another determined and capable young woman in a tensely plotted thriller, and what at first seems like it will be a standard murder mystery but isn't that at all; instead, it's an insightful novel about manipulation, guilt and redemption through love.

The rest of the Gold-tier books are all by P.G. Wodehouse and were all borrowed from the library as ebooks:

• Mulliner Nights. One of Wodehouse's great raconteurs gives us a series of unlikely but always entertaining tales about his various relatives and connections.
• Blandings Castle and Elsewhere. A collection of short pieces featuring some of the author's most beloved characters and locations.
• Full Moon. A Blandings Castle farce with the usual multiple impostures, young love thwarted and then triumphant, and all the trimmings.
• Young Men in Spats. A collection of shorts including the first Uncle Fred story (my favourite character in all of Wodehouse), and some fine stories from the Drones Club and Mr Mulliner.
• Cocktail Time. An Uncle Fred novel, in which that differently moral peer interferes effectively in the affairs of basically everyone.
• The Luck of the Bodkins. One of Wodehouse's satires on Hollywood, where he worked for a time writing for the movies. The farce is strong with this one.

Platinum Tier

And now, the very best of this year's reading, also in alphabetical order by author.

• Castle of the Winds, Christina Baehr (library e-audiobook). Another determined, capable young woman facing genuine peril bravely, with depth of reflection on any number of issues. Third in a strong series.
• Brigands and Breadknives, Travis Baldree (library ebook). I consistently rate Baldree's cozy fantasies highly, and it's because it's more than just cozy fantasy. This one even challenges the standard cozy trope that owning a small business will make the protagonist happy.
• Hogfather, Terry Pratchett (paperback, owned for years). Funny, tense, and thought-provoking, and any one of those is hard to pull off individually, let alone together.
• The Quantum Thief, Hannu Rajaniemi (BookBub). The first book in what I found, unfortunately, to be otherwise a disappointing series, but read as a standalone it's brilliant and different from almost anything else out there.
• Nonesuch: A Novel, Francis Spufford (NetGalley. The last on the list alphabetically would be the top-rated book if I was still putting them in order. It says "A Novel," and it is, but it's not the usual literary self-indulgence in which passive characters sink into over-described tragedy. It reminds me of the best parts of Connie Willis and Charles Williams, without the faults of either, and the ending left me stunned. Come for the summoning of biblically accurate angels in the London Blitz to fight fascism, stay for the skillful description, excellent character arc and thundering plot.

Conclusion

Though NetGalley and BookBub seem to have improved a little, I still read a lot of classics this year, a trend that started in 2023, and made good use of the library. The books I loved came from multiple sources, as did the books I loved less. I hope, if your taste is anything at all like mine, that you can find something you'll enjoy through my recommendations.

Review: Out Law: A Dresden Files Novella

Out Law: A Dresden Files Novella by Jim Butcher
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

It's been a while since Jim Butcher's last book - he's had some personal stuff to deal with, I understand - and honestly, this one refers back to some people and events that I don't remember well or, in some cases, at all, including one of the central characters. This is a lowlife associated with Gentleman Johnnie Marcone, who, thanks to a narrow escape from death, wants to reform, and Marcone, claiming that Dresden owes him a debt for saving his life, brings the guy to Dresden to be taught Decent Human Being 101. Of course, Marcone also has an angle that benefits him.

If anyone is qualified to be Professor of Being a Decent Human Being Under Difficult Circumstances and Making the Hard Choices, it's Harry Dresden, and he does a good job, imparting the wisdom he's picked up throughout his tough life. Sample dialog:

"But what do you get out of it?"
"I get to be me. I get to be the guy who helps people who need it."

(Note: I had a pre-publication version from Netgalley, and there may be changes made before publication. There are a few minor copy editing errors, for example, which I hope will be corrected, but very few.)

It's not just an extended preachment, of course. It's a Harry Dresden story, which means dire supernatural threats, action sequences that mean something, and difficult problems cleverly solved using Dresden's now extensive resources when his default initial approach of "kill it with fire" turns out not to be effective. It's wryly funny, with great banter, the fights feel like Harry and his allies are barely escaping death (and not without injury), and for all Harry's wisecracking he's deadly serious when the situation calls for it. He's even learned when not to run his mouth. And the issues include legal trouble and the IRS, not just the supernatural, so there's a variety of threats to deal with in different ways.

Solidly written, and with that extra layer of reflection on the human condition that raises it into the Gold tier of my Best of the Year list, this is Jim Butcher fully on form and in firm command of his craft.



View all my reviews

Review: The Man In The Queue

The Man In The Queue by Josephine Tey
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Tey enjoys a good reputation as a writer, and this is the first of a well-regarded series, so I gave it a look. It's not a great book even for its time; relies too much on coincidence to keep the plot together, and the main character makes copious use of an ethnic slur for people of Mediterranean origin and generalizes wildly about how English people behave differently from foreigners, which puts him on completely the wrong track for most of the book. He's not as brilliant a detective as he thinks he is, and in the end this is one of those "only solved because the criminal confesses" books that I find so unsatisfactory. Still, I've read worse, and it's promising enough that I'll pick up the next book, on the understanding that this is a weak start to a stronger series.

HarperCollins have the brazen effrontery to say in the back of the book that their HarperPerennials series is "upholding the highest standards of ebook production," but, like most of their books, this one needs more editing. There are a lot of missing commas, fewer but still numerous missing closing quotation marks, and some obvious misreadings by the OCR process, at least one of which was so wrong I couldn't even figure out what the word should have been. Project Gutenberg, who are staffed by volunteers and so can take more time correcting the scans, generally do a better job than major publishers (and especially HarperCollins) of tidying up these old books, but at time of review this one isn't on Project Gutenberg. The 1929 publication date means it should make it there soon, hopefully.

View all my reviews

Review: Hogfather

Hogfather by Terry Pratchett
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This is a reread, of course, because I've read most of the Discworld books multiple times.

Death's granddaughter Susan Sto Helit, determinedly sensible and capable in the face of a universe that refuses to behave sensibly, is the main protagonist, though her grandfather (by adoption of her mother), Death himself, is the instigator of much of the plot. The Hogfather, the Discworld version of Father Christmas, has been or is in the process of being assassinated by means that only make sense on the Discworld, involving tooth fairies and belief, and Death has stepped in as a locum to keep the traditions moving along. Unfortunately, Death only partially understands people and how they work, which creates much of the comedy, along with Pratchett's usual masterful parody of this-worldly things that make no sense (Christmas traditions and their inherent contradictions, mostly) and people who behave with small-minded conventionality.

As with all of his best work, though, it's not just comedy. There are some dark parts, as you'd expect with Death as a leading character and a crazed assassin (described as "a hamper of food, several folding chairs, a tablecloth, an assortment of cooking gear and an entire colony of ants short of a picnic") going around killing people he no longer has any use for, or who might cause some minor inconvenience to his mad plot. But more importantly, there's a good deal of thoughtful reflection on what the true meaning of Hogwatchnight/Christmas is, and a complicated answer that involves the long evolution of tradition and the human ability to find meaning and significance in the middle of chaos.

It's deeply life-affirming; the true villains are the Auditors, literally soulless cosmic bureaucrats who believe that life was a mistake and should be eliminated, especially the messy and chaotic parts like believing in things that make no sense. Susan provides a great bridging character, someone who rather wishes the supernatural wouldn't persist in breaking into what she's trying to make an orderly life, but who is also, when it comes right down to it, firmly on the side of humane values, and definitely not above making use of her own abilities in the cause of preserving everything the auditors oppose. There's a terrific climax in which the question "Who is a monster?" is posed and dramatically answered.

Meanwhile, the wizards of Unseen University are, as usual, tampering with things that ought not to be tampered with and eating big meals, but in a pinch putting their substantial weight behind the traditions that really matter. And there's the wonderful secondary character of the Oh God of Hangovers, Bilious, who's the counterpart of the God of Wine and only ever experiences the consequences of the party, not the party itself. He's one of Pratchett's classic types, the rather pathetic person who manages to rise to be someone we can respect at least a little, by making the right choices in tough situations.

Good and evil are clearly distinguished, but they aren't cartoonish or simplistic. Nothing here is simplistic; it's all thought-provoking and profound, and the thought-provocation rises naturally out of a really well told and highly entertaining story. It's one of the best Pratchetts, in my opinion, up there with Carpe Jugulum and Feet of Clay , to pick one from each of the other main series-within-the-series. I hold back from giving it my very highest tier ranking (Platinum) only because it does get a bit darker than I prefer in places, though for entirely justified reasons.

View all my reviews

Review: Mr Campion & Others

Mr Campion & Others by Margery Allingham
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I've so far only read the first Campion novel, but plan to read the series, so I picked up this collection of short stories to check what it was like. They're mostly light, fairly amusing pieces. Most of them are not murder mysteries (though there are one or two) but kidnappings, blackmail, con jobs, jewel thefts and the like.

In all of them, Campion works with his Scotland Yard contact and friend, Stanislaus Oates, who holds several different ranks in the different stories. The stories are not arranged in order of internal chronology, so Oates can be a superintendent in one story and then a chief inspector in the next. Because they appeared in several different magazines, and the readers might not have read other stories or indeed any Campion at all, they are all standalones, and apart from Oates being promoted there's no development or change in the characters, including Campion.

Where his age is mentioned, Campion is generally around late thirties to early forties, unmarried and apparently unattached, and conscious of the age gap between him and the naive young women who sometimes seek his help as if he was an honorary uncle. They're all of his own class; he's upper class, which is a big part of his expertise and his usefulness to the middle-class Oates, though of course Campion is also a skilled amateur detective. He has casual entree to circles that would be closed to the official police, at least without some concrete evidence of a crime, and even then, they would stand out as he does not.

The crimes and their unwinding are clever ones, though the short format limits how complicated they can be, and overall it's a solid collection of enjoyable mysteries. I look forward to reading more of the novels so that I can see how Allingham takes advantage of the longer format to develop more depth and complexity.

View all my reviews

Review: Red Aces: Being Three Cases of Mr. Reeder

Red Aces: Being Three Cases of Mr. Reeder by Edgar Wallace
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

J.G. Reeder is one of Wallace's few characters that he reused across different books, at least early in his career - though in the first book he's a young man (with an older man as a decoy), and subsequently the older man is Reeder and the young man is never mentioned again, so the continuity is not that strong.

He's a private detective who's also consulted by the police and has some kind of ill-defined connection with the Public Prosecutor's Office, which allows Wallace to have his cake and eat it too. Reeder is independent in terms of what cases he takes on, but he has some semblance of official authority when he needs it.

These three mid-length stories are varied. "Red Aces" is a story of a murder that Reeder happens to come upon on a snowy night, with some theatrical elements and a backstory of organized crime and revenge. His task is to extricate a young man from the elements that make him look guilty and identify the actual culprits. I found the whole thing rather confusing, and for most of it had no idea what had actually happened.

"Kennedy the Con Man" I thought was clever; I was fooled almost to the end. A number of people who had been victims of a scam several years before have disappeared mysteriously, and Reeder is asked to find them.

"The Case of Joe Attymar" had its clever elements too, but I was suspicious of one particular character throughout, though I was never sure. Since we don't get to see all of the evidence that Reeder sees, it isn't a "fair play" mystery.

The construction and unwinding of the cases shows ingenuity and originality, but these are otherwise not top-drawer Wallace. Entertaining, though, certainly.

View all my reviews